istc.earthscience@gmail.com Register
September 1-4, 2026

International Conference on Actual Problems of the Petroleum, Mining, Ecology & Environmental Technology "Earth science-2026"

About conference

The conference represents an informational platform for accumulation of expert opinion on projects and initiatives that are aimed at implementation of farsighted scientific research and development; it allows to present scientific and practical achievements to a wide circle of researchers.

The Goal of the Conference is the exchange of knowledge in the area of innovative science-practical directions of development of land sciences.

Participants of the conference are the representatives of the leading industrial enterprises, engineering, consulting and service companies, science-research and design centers and institutes, leading technical universities and profiling civil organizations and authority agencies.
.
Earth Science is set to welcome hundreds of delegates, featuring renowned transnational keynote speakers and scholars delivering oral presentations. Exhibitions and delegates from all corners of the globe will come together to establish a platform for global innovation and impactful advancements in this field. The event offers unparalleled opportunities for transnational networking and collaborations with international companies.
This prestigious Conference will serve as a remarkable gathering for Earth Science Scientists and other professionals. With an expected attendance of approximately 200 speakers and over 400 delegates, this event promises to be a truly exceptional occasion.

The conference will have unique conditions for young scientists. Award for young scientist.
Young scientist Award certificate and memento to the winners.
Young Scientists will get appropriate and timely information by our conference.
O urs conference platform for collaboration among young researchers for better development. Award should motivate participants to strive to realize their full potential, which could in turn be beneficial to the field as whole.
To add to its promise, the venue of the event has been selected after much research to assure that the event is being held in one of the hotspots regions for the concerned field, therefore attendance is expected to be astounding, both in quality and quantity. The variety of prospective audience includes figures of academic excellence, interested industrialists, Students.

Publication of articles:
Official languages:
Russian
English
Participation format:
1) in the traditional face-to-face format;
2) remotely in the format of a video conference;
More about remote participation

Thematic sections

Venue

PANARAMS Tashkent Hotel, a member of RADISSON Individuals, located in the most dynamic city of Central Asia will pleasantly surprise you with its modern design, bird flight elevated restaurant and many additional entertainment options. This is a unique compound providing all facilities for comfortable recreation, successful business meetings and negotiations, family leisure, and health-improving sessions. And all of these are at the highest level.

Attractions
“Chorsu” Bazaar is one of the largest bazaars in Uzbekistan and Central Asia, located in “Eski shahar”, the old part of Tashkent, on Navoi Street in the Almazar district.

Events
At guests’ disposal is the 250 sq.m Ballroom, designed in a classic style, which allows you to host events of any level from small weddings to international conferences. Audio and video equipment is integrated into the hall, a central air conditioning system is installed. Check out our special offers for banquets and conference packages.

Tashkent – is the capital and largest city of Uzbekistan. It is the most populous city in Central Asia, with a population of more than 3 million people. It is located in northeastern Uzbekistan, near the border with Kazakhstan.

Before the influence of Islam in the mid-8th century AD, Sogdian and Turkic culture was predominant. After Genghis Khan destroyed the city in 1219, it was rebuilt and profited from its location on the Silk Road. From the 18th to the 19th centuries, the city became an independent city-state, before being re-conquered by the Khanate of Kokand. In 1865, Tashkent fell to the Russian Empire; as a result, it became the capital of Russian Turkestan. In Soviet times, it witnessed major growth and demographic changes due to forced deportations from throughout the Soviet Union. Much of Tashkent was destroyed in the 1966 Tashkent earthquake, but it was soon rebuilt as a model Soviet city. It was the fourth-largest city in the Soviet Union at the time, after Moscow, Leningrad and Kyiv.

Today, as the capital of an independent Uzbekistan, Tashkent retains a multiethnic population, with ethnic Uzbeks as the majority. In 2009, it celebrated 2,200 years of its written history. The master plan of Tashkent until 2045 was approved.

Uzbekistan – is a doubly landlocked country located in Central Asia. It is surrounded by five countries: Kazakhstan to the north, Kyrgyzstan to the northeast, Tajikistan to the southeast, Afghanistan to the south, and Turkmenistan to the southwest, making it one of only two doubly landlocked countries on Earth, the other being Liechtenstein. Uzbekistan is part of the Turkic world, as well as a member of the Organization of Turkic States. Uzbek, spoken by the Uzbek people, is the official language and spoken by the majority of its inhabitants, while Russian and Tajik are significant minority languages. Islam is the predominant religion, and most Uzbeks are Sunni Muslims.

Uzbekistan is a secular state, with a semi-presidential constitutional government. Uzbekistan comprises 12 regions (vilayats), Tashkent City, and one autonomous republic, Karakalpakstan. While non-governmental organisations have defined Uzbekistan as “an authoritarian state with limited civil rights”, significant reforms under Uzbekistan’s second president, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, have been made following the death of the first president, Islam Karimov. Owing to these reforms, relations with the neighbouring countries of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Afghanistan have drastically improved. A United Nations report of 2020 found much progress toward achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

For the presentation of reports in the format of a video conference, sites will be organized in four countries around the world.

Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece

University of Rousse, Rousse, Bulgaria

Registration fee and important dates

– 150 Euros for foreign participants (payment after December 1, 2025 – 200 euros).
Travel, accommodation and food expenses are not included in the registration fee and are paid by the participants independently. Due to the currency fluctuation, the organizing committee has the rights to change the fee rates, yet not later than June 8, 2026.
The payment of the registration fee is accepted from both individuals and legal entities. The registration fee should be paid only after the notification about acceptance of the paper in the conference program, yet not later than June 8, 2026. Please note the paper will be published only after receipt of the registration fee.
Event location: Panarams Tashkent Hotel.

– deadline for submission of reports: – March 2, 2026;
– notification of the inclusion of reports in the program before July 31, 2026;
– date September 1-4, 2026.

Review process

“Earth science” papers are reviewed using a double-blind process managed through EasyChair. The reviewing process has three phases: bidding, reviewing, and discussion and metareviewing.

Reviewers are expected to provide high-quality reviews to provide authors with feedback that will help to improve the work for publication or for future submission. Conference peer review committee (CPRC) lead the discussion among reviewers and metareview each paper, providing a recommendation and feedback to the program chairs.

Each paper submission is expected to receive tow reviews and a metareview, but this number is subject to change depending on the number of submissions and the number of reviewers and CPRC.

All paper submissions are anonymous. Reviewers and CPRC are and should remain anonymous to one another and to the authors of the submissions they review. When writing comments on a review during a discussion, please refer to yourself and other reviewers by the number of their review.

Recommendations for reviewers

The paper publishing activity at conferences is very serious indeed: careers and reputations, as well as academic tenure decisions, often hinge on these publications.

This means that we have a responsibility to be serious in the reviewing process. You should try to do a solid and constructive review. This is obvious; but one of the complaints we have heard about some instances of the review process is that some reviews can be so sketchy that it looks like the reviewer did not even seem to take the time to read the paper carefully. That would be certainly not professional. In the long run, casual reviewing may be damaging to conferences.

There is no problem in being too busy to do a good review, or to have over-committed yourself and be unable to review all the papers you agreed to review. But in that case please back out early enough to allow recovery. If you cannot do the job, please inform us well in advance so that the Program Chair has time to select another reviewer before the deadline.

Be Relevant and Helpful
Authors seek valuable comments in a review, such as those that help the authors understand the shortcomings of their work and how they might improve it. Be respectful and carefully explain why you like or dislike a submission so the authors can learn from your expertise.

Reviewer and work CPRC timeline

Review deadlines:

The following dates describe the timeline for reviewer & CPRC work on “Earth science”. Note that the review period is just two and a half months.

All reviewers and CPRC are expected to engage with the process throughout the fourteen weeks from Monday 2 of March to Monday 8 June, as described below. Please consider your workload and other commitments around these dates before offering your services as a reviewer. Those who cannot commit to engagement throughout this period should not volunteer to be reviewers or CPRC for “Earth science”.

Activity Start date End date (Anywhere on Earth, UTC-12)

Bidding: Monday 23 February — Mon 2 March ,

Reviewing: Mon, March 2 – Sun, June 8.

Discussion and metareviewing: Mon 22 June – Mon 20 July

Remain Anonymous
At conference the review process is double-blind. All reviewers are thus expected to maintain anonymity and authors should avoid revealing themselves in the paper. In particular, it is never appropriate for reviewers to contact the authors of an accepted paper directly mentioning their role in the process. Requesting citations primarily to one’s own work may thwart anonymity, so it should be carefully considered.

Protect Ideas
As a reviewer for conference, you have the responsibility to protect the confidentiality of the ideas represented in the papers you review. Сonference submissions are by their nature not published documents. The work is considered new and proprietary by the authors. Do not show the paper to anyone else, including colleagues or students, unless you have asked them to write a review, or to help with your review.
Avoid Conflict of Interest
As a reviewer of conference paper, it is important for you to stay clear of any conflict of interest. There should be absolutely no question about the impartiality of reviews. Thus, if you believe that a paper which you are assigned to review could be the cause of a possible conflict of interest, you should return the paper immediately and not submit a review. Conflicts of interest include (but are not limited to) situations in which:
You work at the same institution as one of the authors.
You have been directly involved in the work and will be receiving credit in some way. For instance, if you’re a member of the author’s thesis committee, and the paper is about their thesis work, then you were involved.
You were the MSc/PhD advisor or advisee of one of the authors. This represents a lifetime conflict of interest.
You have unpublished work that would get scooped by the current submission because it tackles the same problem using a similar approach. If asked to review a paper that can create such a cross-reviewing conflict, please turn down the request and immediately inform the Program Chair.
The assignment algorithm of paper reviews attempts to prevent most conflicts. But if you recognize the work or the author(s) and feel it could present a conflict of interest, send the paper back to the Program Chair as soon as possible so they can find someone else to review it.

Organizers and sponsors